Re: Convincing ...

Subject: Re: Convincing ...
From: "nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il" <nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:49:53 -0500


> but there are times when "ungrammatical" constructions
> may be very clear as well--even superior to a strictly
> grammatical construction. For any who doubt this, there
> is the classic story of Churchill who, upon being
> admonished about ending a sentence with a preposition,
> is said to have retorted "Madam, there are some things
> up with which I will not put!"

There are a couple of things wrong with the Churchill story--
I mean besides the fact that it didn't happen that way.

First, the extreme inversion is unnecessary. The sentence
could have ended "things with which I will not put up" and
still not have ended with a preposition (because "up" is
an adverb or, as some hippy-dippy grammarians might have it,
a part of a phrasal verb).

Second, there isn't really a rule against ending a sentence
with a preposition. It's just a bugaboo. No respectable
style guide forbids ending a sentence with a preposition,
though some guides may warn that your less enlightened readers
may think it's a mistake.

I think that most of the time, when the issue of gaining
clarity by sacrificing grammatical rules comes up, either
the rule isn't a real rule or there is a grammatical solution
(not necessarily the first one that springs to mind) at least
as good as the ungrammatical one.

In decades of technical writing, I can recall only one
grammatical error that's been necessary for the sake of
clarity, and that's the plural attributive noun (as in
"parts list").


Mark L. Levinson
Herzliya, Israel
nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Technical Communication Certificate online - Malaspina-University College, Canada. Online training in technical writing, software (FrameMaker, RoboHelp, Dreamweaver, Acrobat), document & web design, writing manuals, job search. www.pr.mala.bc.ca/tech_comm.htm for details.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: re Brads was Help Finding "Report Covers" With Longer Spines!
Next by Author: list style
Previous by Thread: Re: Convincing ...
Next by Thread: Re: Convincing ...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads