RE: unfortunate project names

Subject: RE: unfortunate project names
From: "Diane Evans" <diane_evans -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:39:40 -0800


My two personal favorites are unfortunate acronyms.

I worked on a project abbreviated as "WPPS", which was often pronounced "Whoops." That's the way the project ended :)

In our laboratory information management system, we use the concept of a functional unit. It is often abbreviated as "FU."


Diane Evans
Technical Writer/Requirements Analyst



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: unfortunate project names: From: Gary Robinson

Previous by Author: Opinions about datacenter usage
Next by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question - Editors
Previous by Thread: RE: unfortunate project names
Next by Thread: Re: unfortunate project names


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads