Re: Why not Word97?

Subject: Re: Why not Word97?
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:08:10 -0800


We were "pushed" into Office2003 because our company is on a
maintenance contract. I'm still wading through all the new stuff that's
been added since Word2000 to find the switches to turn off the most
annoying and useless new bells and whistles, such as the autocreate
styles that I posted on previously. I suspect that once these have all
been shut down the program will be OK.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoff Hart" <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca>
> Not sure why this is a problem. Word 97 and 2000 are probably the last
> really good versions of Word; subsequent versions added so many
> defective bells and whistles (particularly if you use revision tracking
> heavily) that they're a questionable upgrade at best imnsho.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Why not Word97?: From: Adria Quinones
Why not Word97?: From: Geoff Hart

Previous by Author: Re: Why not Word97?
Next by Author: Re: unfortunate project names
Previous by Thread: Why not Word97?
Next by Thread: Re: Why not Word97?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads