Re: PageMaker vs. Framemaker (those who've used both)

Subject: Re: PageMaker vs. Framemaker (those who've used both)
From: cpldll -at- earthlink -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:07:45 -0600


I believe that Frame 7.1 touts a PageMaker conversion utility. I have no
experience with it. Perhaps, someone who has used it could comment on its
effectiveness.

Chris La Porte

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: FW: re Interviews & red flags & MENSA
Next by Author: Comments in Code
Previous by Thread: Re: PageMaker vs. Framemaker (those who've used both)
Next by Thread: Re: PageMaker vs. Framemaker (those who've used both)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads