RE: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)

Subject: RE: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)
From: "Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- Users -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:31:49 -0400


Yeah, I never had any complaints about STC either. In fact, I've been
feeling a little guilty about not being a more active participant.

-----Original Message-----
From: Beth Agnew [mailto:Beth -dot- Agnew -at- senecac -dot- on -dot- ca]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 2:02 PM
Subject: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)


As with every organization, there are things that are done well, and
things that are done poorly. I have found the STC to be more useful to
me personally as I stepped forward to be involved in the aspects of it
that mattered to me. The STC can't please everyone, so we have to
recognize those limitations and accept it for what it is. Where there
are gaps in service to members, perhaps there are opportunities for
others to step in. Techwr=l is the best example of this. --Beth

----------------------------------
And Kelly Oja responded in part:
If I had one real legitimate complaint ... but I am holding off because
I am not doing anything to contribute...

-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-118812 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-118812 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com]On Behalf Of Oja, W.
Kelly
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 7:36 AM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community

Karen asked:

>I haven't been on this list very long and I'm really surprised by the
intense dislike >several people have expressed for STC. Is there anyone
on this list that likes STC?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Attention:
The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
This email message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by NetIQ MailMarshal
_____________________________________________________________________________________

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community
Next by Author: Re: ADMIN: An Open Letter to the TECHWR-L Community
Previous by Thread: Followup on FM 7.1 and AutoCAD files
Next by Thread: Re: Why we hate/love the STC (Was open letter ...)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads