Re: Binding methods

Subject: Re: Binding methods
From: "T.W. Smith" <techwordsmith -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:18:10 -0400


Can you just deliver online?

If not, I like spiral better than 3-ring. Why? It looks more
professional and, more importantly, it takes up less space when opened
up and being used. What I don't like about spiral is the lack of text
and info on the spine, but I'd live with that rather than have 3-ring.

Updates? You mean, ship 3-hole punch paper, assume those sheets make
it to the guy with the binder, and assume the guy with the binder puts
them in? Never happen.

We use perfect binding and hard covers, we make software, and we are
weird that way.

What is it you doc, anyway?

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:54:46 -0400, David Tinsley <dtinsley -at- ndigital -dot- com> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I am soliciting opinions on different binding methods. We currently use
> spiral binding for all our manuals. We are thinking of introducing 3 ring
> binding along with tab dividers for our larger manuals. We have produced a
> mock up that we think looks quite professional; tabs, nice spine so it can
> be read while sat on a shelf; does not collapse on itself when stood on end;
> longer lasting; easier updates.
>
> When we presented it to one of our product managers she was not impressed
> and told us that it was a step backwards and made us look unprofessional.
>
> I would like to hear other opinions on binding methods.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5: Featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author
support, PDF and XML support and much more!
TRY IT TODAY at http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrl

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT: New! Document review system for Word and FrameMaker
authors. Automatic browser-based drafts with unlimited reviewers. Full
online discussions -- no Web server needed! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Binding methods: From: David Tinsley

Previous by Author: Re: STC Transformation -- info
Next by Author: Fwd: Binding methods
Previous by Thread: Re: Binding methods
Next by Thread: Re: Binding methods


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads