RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???

Subject: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
From: Mailing List <mlist -at- ca -dot- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:05:56 -0400


About writers insisting on WYSIWYG and the ability to
tinker for semantic markup, Gene Kim-Eng sez:

> Hell, I've gotten that just trying to get people to
> work within a standard template in Frame or Word
> without tinkering with the formatting for individual
> documents.

> As for the "why WYSIWYG," my guess is that the vast
> majority of people working in XML see one delivery
> format or another, whether print or web or whatever,
> as their "primary," everything else as "something
> else," and want to work in WYSIWYG for their "primary"
> format. Hardly anyone I work with, including most
> web designers, tells me they prefer to work with raw
> markup code anymore. It's all part of the idea that
> the tool should not take more of your attention than
> your actual project does. So the challenge for anyone
> attempting to sell a "blue sky" XML tool is how to give
> writers whose "primary" format is print with a WP
> interface while also providing web designers with
> web page authoring UIs, etc., etc.

It might be as simple as:

SOME people (while not the world's best) are reasonably
good at writing content, and reasonably good at making
it look the way it should, and they've been doing both
for years.

Suddenly, you want to take away part of their jobs,
a part that they might have enjoyed. "You are a cog.
We have other specialist cogs who do what you formerly
did. Confine yourself to single-function cog-ness,
and like it. Have a nice day."

/kevin

--
The following text added by my employer, outside my control:
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be
privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to this message, and then delete it from your computer without
copying or disclosing it.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

>From a single set of Word documents, create online Help and printed
documentation with ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 7 Professional, a new yearly
subscription service offering free updates and upgrades, support, and more.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Getting a new writer up to speed quickly
Next by Author: RE: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Previous by Thread: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???
Next by Thread: RE: RE: Why WYSIWYG for XML???


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads