Re: Don't say what you CANNOT do in documents

Subject: Re: Don't say what you CANNOT do in documents
From: Brian Barker <b -dot- m -dot- barker -at- btinternet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 02:28:07 +0100


At 13:41 21/04/2004 -0400, Dick Margulis wrote (on the (mis)use of "criteria" for "criterion"):

The American Heritage Dictionary employs a usage panel for the express purpose of watching and reporting on such issues, and a quick perusal of their most recent edition would be a better way of settling this than going with who shouts the loudest or most frequently.

I just did a quick lookup (using John's favorite tool, Google) and found that the 2000 edition of AHD says this (I think it was quoted earlier in the thread by someone else, as well):

"USAGE NOTE: Like the analogous etymological plurals agenda and data, criteria is widely used as a singular form. Unlike them, however, it is not yet acceptable in that use."

The dictionary writers have missed a point here if they think that the disputed use of _criteria_ is analogous to the use of _agenda_ and _data_ as singular words. In the case of _agenda_ - the doings, or things to be done, perhaps at a meeting - and _data_ - a plurality of facts or values - the originally plural words may indeed now be regarded as singular, but they are still being used to represent a plurality of the items concerned. You might refer to one item to be raised at a meeting as an agenda point or an agenda item, but never as "an agenda": that's the whole list. Similarly, you might refer to a single value or fact as a piece of data or one item of data, but not as "a data".

So it might make sense to defend the use of "criteria" to describe a singular group of a plurality of criteria: such a use could be acceptable as a grammatically singular word. But that is not what is happening: instead, "criteria" is being used to describe a singular concept, in place of the correct singular word ("criterion"). This is simply a mistake.

Yes: of course the dictionary properly includes this misuse, since the dictionary's purpose is to help readers understand what they read, right or wrong.

Brian Barker (London, UK)
b.m.barker[at]btinternet.com



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION: RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward
in Help authoring technology, featuring Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
From a single set of Word documents, create quality printed documentation,
HTML Help, cross-platform HTML, WinHelp and JavaHelp, with ComponentOne's DoctoHelp 7 Professional, http://www.componentone.com/doctohelp

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: billing ethics
Next by Author: RE: Documenting installers?
Previous by Thread: Re: To Space or not to Space
Next by Thread: Documentation included in software build


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads