RE: RE: RE: Contracting

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Contracting
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: 17 Mar 2004 22:24:36 GMT

All I got was that the poster was asked to paint during
a "lull" in the contract, and as a result looked for
another job. Nothing was said about whether the "lull"
was going to be a temporary thing or the first step down
a long slide into oblivion. All I got from the post was
that the request was seen as unacceptable. Obviously, if
the odds of nonpayment were high, heading out the door
would be a sensible choice, but simply being asked to do
a job other than the one originally hired for is not
necessarily an indication that that is the case.

Gene Kim-Eng

------- Original Message -------
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:46:33 -0500 John Posada wrote:

However, that wasn't how the original post positioned it. It wasn't the
painting that I objected to, it was the result that it represented...the
same result that I'm fighting now...lawsuit to get my last $8,100 back


ROBOHELP X5 - ALL NEW VERSION. Now with Word 2003 support, Content
Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more!

Now is the best time to buy - special end of month promos, including:
$100 mail-in rebate; Free online orientation on content management
functionality; Huge savings on support and future product releases;
PLUS Great discounts on RoboHelp training. OFFER EXPIRES March 31!
Call 1-800-358-9370 or visit:

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: RE: RE: Contracting
Next by Author: Re: Gene Kim-Eng
Previous by Thread: RE: RE: Contracting
Next by Thread: RE: RE: RE: Contracting

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads