RE: Proofreading

Subject: RE: Proofreading
From: twriter01 -at- hotmail -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:41:37 -0700

I apologize for being unclear. Hopefully this info will help. My manager
requested that I proofread all procedures. There is a need for
proofreading, because errors, for example, typos, spelling, etc., have
been getting by on approved documents. I believe originally, it was the
Production department's responsibility to to proofread production
procedures, but they have always let it slide because they are too "busy."
And adding the proofreading of all revisions submitted by everyone would
be a big chunk out of my time that I don't have to spare. I guess the
problem is should there be just one proofreader for ALL revisions
regardless of who sumbitted them? Is that common? What are common
practices in this situation? TIA


ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER AS LOW AS $299! Offer expires March 31.
Publish your FrameMaker documents online -- quickly and easily!

New licenses are only $899 for one and $499 for additional licenses.
Use a competitor's product? Switch to RoboHelp for FrameMaker
for only $299! Buy today: CALL 1-800-462-4420 or 1 858-847-7900.
Hurry, offer expires March 31 2004.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Proofreading
Next by Author: Re: Proofreading
Previous by Thread: RE: Proofreading
Next by Thread: Re: Proofreading

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads