Subject: RE: "DO NOT COOK"?
From: Brian Jennings <BrianJennings -at- cougarmtn -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:43:05 -0700

Personally, I think the problem is that some of the wrappers include
instruction and one does not. If some have instructions, all should have
instructions. Since the instructions are on the box I would bet removing the
instructions from all the wrappers would work as well (except there would be
the danger some would eat them without cooking) since it would force the
customer to refer to the box for instructions. Then again, most candy has
the instructions "do not eat wrapper" so one wonders if there is a fullproof



ROBOHELP FOR FRAMEMAKER AS LOW AS $299! Offer expires March 31.
Publish your FrameMaker documents online -- quickly and easily!

New licenses are only $899 for one and $499 for additional licenses.
Use a competitor's product? Switch to RoboHelp for FrameMaker
for only $299! Buy today: CALL 1-800-462-4420 or 1 858-847-7900.
Hurry, offer expires March 31 2004.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Improving internal assembly instructions
Next by Author: RE: teaching technical writing to engineers
Previous by Thread: Re: "DO NOT COOK"?
Next by Thread: RE: "DO NOT COOK"?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads