TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Don't believe the offshore hype? From:"Richard G. Combs" <richard -dot- combs -at- voyanttech -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:33:04 -0700
Dan Goldstein quoted my claim that:
> > ... The number of new jobs created is probably greater than the
> > number of jobs
> > lost, and they're undoubtedly better jobs, on average. In the
> > long run, this
> > _must_ be the case. By spending less to produce the same
> > level of goods and
> > services, we've freed up money to produce a new, higher level
> > of goods and
> > services...
> Hmmm. "Must" be the case? Got any numbers to back that one up?
You misunderstand, Dan, I'm not making an empirical claim, based on
observation, but a logical one, based on an understanding of the laws of
economics. Would you question a claim that apples fall to the ground and ask
for empirical data, or would you settle for an explanation based on an
understanding of the law of gravity? :-)
A full explanation would require many pages (trust me, I have an Econ.
degree ;-) ), but here's a highly simplified example. Let's say I make
widgets, and I can increase my profit from $1 million dollars to $2 million
per $10 million (retail value) worth of widgets by <pick one: outsourcing,
automating, waving a magic wand>. What will I do with the $1 million I've
Assuming I have a lick of sense, I'll invest it in producing something at
least as valuable as -- probably more valuable than -- using it to produce
more widgets. I wouldn't invest in something *less* valuable than widgets
(mud pies or french fries, for instance) -- that would be stupid.
An equal or greater return on my investment means that the resources
employed -- including labor -- have an equal or greater value. Even if the
value of the new jobs created is merely the same as the widget-making jobs
(and thus the reward to labor is the same), our community/society/world now
has the *same* number of widgets as before, only cheaper -- *plus* all the
new stuff created by investing the freed-up $1 million.
So, in the aggregate, we're all richer -- and the same income affords us a
greater quantity of goods and services. Even if a laid-off widget worker's
new job pays only as much as the previous one, that worker is better off. If
it pays more, that worker is much better off.
End of econ. lesson. There'll be a quiz later. ;-)
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Voyant, a division of Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
richardDOTcombs AT voyanttechDOTcom
rgcombs AT freeDASHmarketDOTnet
ROBOHELP IS THE INDUSTRY STANDARD IN HELP AUTHORING
New RoboHelp X5 includes all new features such as,
content management, multi-author support, distributed
workforce support, XML and PDF support, and much more!
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.