Re: Queries on Single Sourcing
For our software product, we generate an online help file as well as
a printed manual. We plan to implement single sourcing. Can you
suggest which is the best tool? FM + Webworks or RoboHelp + Word
Philosophically, there should be a substantial difference between
the manual and the help file. "Help" should be concise and oriented
towards solving a problem. The manual should perhaps be tutorial or
comprehensive, or both. The user who gets a portion of the manual as
"help" feels like the little girl asking about elephants:
"Mommy, please tell me about elephants."
"Why don't you go ask your father?"
"Mommy, I don't want to know THAT MUCH about elephants!"
The last time I worked on help files, we faked them by a kind of
single sourcing. The feeling was that the competition had a help
system and we did not, but that the effort to make good help was
too great. So instead we made a useless "help" that looked good
in a bullet list of features, but served no purpose if someone
actually tried to use it. I spent two weeks fighting the decision,
trying to explain that one week of my time was all that was needed.
Then I gave up. Portions of the manual, not my well-crafted help
files, were shipped. That company is now long gone, but I'm still
around. Does that mean I won?
Follow-Ups:
- RE: Queries on Single Sourcing, Bill Swallow
References:
Queries on Single Sourcing: From: Anagha . Mulay
Previous by Author:
Re: Editing .pdfs - Continued
Next by Author:
Re: FONT STANDARDS
Previous by Thread:
Queries on Single Sourcing
Next by Thread:
RE: Queries on Single Sourcing
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads