RE: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)

Subject: RE: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)
From: "John Posada" <JPosada -at- isogon -dot- com>
To: <lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:36:41 -0500

How about there are 4,972 tech writers busy as hell and if we see one
more "just-for-fun" survey that doesn't make us or our management money,
we're gonna go postal?

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
Isogon Corporation
http://www.isogon.com

-----Original Message-----
From: lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com
[mailto:lyndsey -dot- amott -at- docsymmetry -dot- com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:21 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)

1. There are 5,000 subscribers to TECHWR-L. I received 28 responses, a
response rate of, er, well, somebody else will have to do the math.
Possible Conclusions:
a) Only 28 techwriters have done the Myers-Briggs test
b) There are not really 5,000 subscribers to the list
c) There are 5,000 subscribers, but hardly anyone actually reads the
posts
d) People feel that revealing their Myers-Briggs type is akin to wearing
a see-through blouse to work
e) Ho hum, Myers-Briggs is soooooo booooooooring
f) There are 4972 lurkers on this list, all of whom are terrified of
Isaac





Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Word 2003 - Bookmark Cross-reference List
Next by Author: RE: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)
Previous by Thread: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)
Next by Thread: Re: Myers-Briggs survey results (long)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads