Re: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?

Subject: Re: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?
From: "Ed Wurster" <eawurster -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:04:17 -0500


----- Original Message -----

From: Me
> > > It takes:
> > >
> > > 1. financial commitment from a company,
> > > 2. allotment of sufficient time for the tasks, and
> > > 3. someone who can translate technical concepts.

From: "Gordon Graham"
> I've answered this question before with these four factors... which run
> quite parallel to yours...
>
> 1. Enough budget
> 2. Enough time
> 3. Enough expertise
> 4. Enough management support
>
> My list divides "brains" into the skills of the practitioners and the
> support of the managers. I don't think that's too many words to answer
this
> time-honoured question, do you?
>
> Notice that it doesn't take "oodles" of any item, just enough to do a
> good-enough job. Which is unfortunately seldom enough the case.
>

I'd like to stay with 3 concepts. Enough budget implies management support?

Ed




Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?: From: Gordon Graham

Previous by Author: Re: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?
Next by Author: Re: Users writing their own procedures
Previous by Thread: RE: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?
Next by Thread: RE: It shouldn't be that hard to write good doc, should it?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads