RE: What would you like to read?

Subject: RE: What would you like to read?
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:45:42 -0400


Bonnie...the question was posted with very little explanation, nothing about
why, nothing about what it would be used for. When you throw out a vague
question, it's up to the list's imagination on how to respond...and you know
what kind of imagination we have. Don't look at us if 100% of the responses
went one way and you wanted another...we're ALL wrong?

Yes, we're technical writers...but we're not mind readers. We're subject to
the same misunderstandings that any of your document readers are subject to.
Give us guidance and we'll give you intelligent answers. Give us none and we
won't use any intelligence.

John Posada

From: "John Posada" <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
> Bonnie wrote:
> >My question was a serious one, and remains so.
>
>
> What DOES determines whether a question is truly serious or not?
>
> ...the intention of the asker, or the multiple responses?.
>
> I vote for the later.
>
> John Posada
>

-----------------
John,

I do not understand what you mean by "the multiple responses." How do
responses determine the intent of the poster?

WIth such a short message as mine was, one takes into account the subject
heading and the body text in determining intent. I was fishing for real
interest in reading about particular subjects. I knew I was risking humorous
responses, but I believed at least some would take into account the entire
post.


****************************************************************************
**********************************
This electronic mail message contains information that (a) is or may be
CONFIDENTIAL,
PROPRIETARY IN NATURE, OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED BY LAW FROM DISCLOSURE,
and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. If
you are not an
intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and take the steps
necessary to
delete the message completely from your computer system.

Not Intended as a Substitute for a Writing: Notwithstanding the Uniform
Electronic Transaction
Act or any other law of similar effect, absent an express statement to the
contrary,
this e-mail message, its contents, and any attachments hereto are not
intended to represent
an offer or acceptance to enter into a contract and are not otherwise
intended to bind
this sender, barnesandnoble.com llc, barnesandnoble.com inc. or any other
person or entity.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

NEED TO PUBLISH YOUR FRAMEMAKER CONTENT ONLINE?
?Mustang? (code name) is a NEW online publishing tool for FrameMaker that
lets you easily single-source content to Web, intranets, and online Help.
The interface is designed for FrameMaker users, so there is little or no
learning curve and no macro language required! See a live demo that
will take your breath away: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l3

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: What would you like to read?
Next by Author: RE: Ethical dilemma
Previous by Thread: RE: What would you like to read?
Next by Thread: Re: What would you like to read?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads