RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?

Subject: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?
From: "Dick Margulis " <margulis -at- mail -dot- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:08:09 -0400


Let me take another crack at what I see as the _real_ issue with this.

Thinking in XML for the moment, I might have something called <featurelist>, say, that defines a block containing some arbitrary number of <featurename>-<featuredescription> pairs.

Okay, now I want to render that list of features in different output formats--PDF, HTML, whatever. So I have some sort of engine (I'm vague on all this stuff because I haven't actually used XML for anything yet) that applies a transformation to my document (is that what XSLT means???) and outputs it in one format or another.

But, from what I gather, this transformation is rather simplistic. It can figure out that an em dash is a glyph in PDF and an entity in HTML and space-hyphen-hyphen-space in ASCII, perhaps; but it can't figure out that the top-margin defined for the list should not be applied if the list follows a heading or a page break but it should be applied if the list follows a text paragraph. Or it cannot figure out that the figure should go after the third list item in order to fit it on a letter page but after the fifth bullet item to fit it on an A4 page. Nor can it figure out that the top-margin (or "space above" or whatever you call it) needs to be adjusted up a couple of points on page 6 and adjusted down a couple of points on page 7.

So what I am in general decrying here is that we've gained some power but traded away some subtleties to get it.

I know I'm just being curmudgeonly about this and nobody else in the world cares, but I wanted to vent. Okay?

Dick

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
Reply-To: John Posada <JPosada -at- book -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:32:27 -0400

>
>This is of interest because I'm in FM and am currently reworking my book to
>break it into 6 separate books, by category (DB, DNA, Process, etc.).
>
>An override style, such as Override2pt, is going to have attributes in
>addition to a 2pt difference...it's got a Font, an indentation, a tab
>setting, etc. Yes?
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ANNOUNCING ROBOHELP STUDIO

RoboHelp Studio maximizes your Help authoring power by combining
RoboHelp Office and RoboDemo, so you can easily create professional
Help systems that feature interactive tutorials and demos.

Find out more about RoboHelp Studio at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?
Next by Author: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?
Previous by Thread: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?
Next by Thread: RE: RE: Interviewing "under the hood"?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads