Re: Set up to Fail

Subject: Re: Set up to Fail
From: "Brian Das" <brian_das -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:35:48 -0400


Ok, waaaaaait a minute.

Why didn't the project start with an effort to plan the documentation, and
estimate resources based on agreed-upon statements of quality and scope, and
get sign-off on the plan? On a huge project that's failed twice before, I'd
say it's time for someone to step up. This stinks of lousy project
management.

Take the compliment, by all means -- but make sure you don't respond by
complimenting your boss on his project management skills! <g> Seriously, the
more appropriate response might be to propose and implement a project
planning methodology.

Sinserely,
Brian the Bitter.

On Wed, 28 May 2003 13:26:35 -0400 John Posada wrote:

Anyone else ever find out that they were in a similar situation and how did
you feel about it?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Robohelp X3, from eHelp, lets you quickly and easily create
professional Help systems for all your Windows and Web-based
applications, including Net.

Order RoboHelp X3 in May and receive a $100 mail-in rebate, PLUS
free RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.

Order RoboHelp today: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Set up to Fail: From: John Posada

Previous by Author: Re: "trainer's notes" in ms word?
Next by Author: Re: Quick Question
Previous by Thread: Re: Set up to Fail
Next by Thread: Re: Set up to Fail


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads