RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"

Subject: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"
From: MList -at- chrysalis-its -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:24:41 -0400


Suggestions have trickled to a halt, both here and on
the CE-L list (where they were uncharacteristically
more serious than you lot).

I'll be taking what I've gathered into a meeting, now.

Thanks very much for your contributions.

Cheers,

/kevin

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l/


Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim" (an aside)
Next by Author: RE: certification
Previous by Thread: RE: When a "shim" is not a "shim"
Next by Thread: When a "shim" is not a "shim"?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads