TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Article: "Living Documentation" From:eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:08:33 -0500
<<The trouble is, you're starting from a different premise than Andrew.
Andrew is assuming that a tech-writer can or should be enough of an
expert that he or she doesn't have to accept developer's information
uncritically. You're assuming a dependency on the developers. Given this
difference, the two of you can hardly help coming to a different conclusion.>>
The space between a writer having 0% responsibility for accuracy and 100%
responsibility is huge. To argue any percentage is plain stupidity.
Accuracy about what? In what situation, under what circumstance?
Even if you are a good writer and know enough of the subject matter to berate
the SME into awe over your knowledge and have them come to you for information,
there will still be situations where the information given to you by the SME
will have to be trusted. Not to mention the times when what was written was
correct and accurate for the time at which it was written.
But in the highly critical, disdainful, pigeon holed, black and white, I am
right the world is wrong world of certain list members such situations NEVER
exist. A rediculous unsuportable generalisation is presented without any room
for interpretation or qualification. When others attempt to qualify it never
ending pathetic meta arguments arise about how many SMEs can dance on the head
of a pin and what the acceptable undefinable gap in knowledge/responsibility
between a fictitious undefined SME and a fictitious undefined writer in a
fictitious undefined domain is.
BAH.
Eric L. Dunn
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Purchase RoboHelp X3 in April and receive a $100 mail-in
rebate, plus FREE RoboScreenCapture and WebHelp Merge Module.
Order here: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.