Re: Need a smarter person than me

Subject: Re: Need a smarter person than me
From: Dick Margulis <margulis -at- fiam -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:54:14 -0500




dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com wrote:

Sharon Burton-Hardin wrote:

...all body text must be 5/32 inches and ...all warnings and cautions must be 3/16 inches


That'd be 11.25 points and 13.5 points, respectively.

Those are hardly common type sizes. <:(


They actually are not type sizes at all. And therein lies the rub. These are labeling requirements, and they are based on some rather strange assumptions on the part of the lawyers who draft government regulations.

Such requirements refer to the height of printed letters--that is, they take into account only the actual visible impression, not the theoretical font size. So, to be safe, Sharon would have to use 12 pt and 14 pt type, respectively. The reason is that the design of most fonts includes some variable space above the caps and ascenders and below the descenders that is never covered by ink. Further, a given line of type appearing on a label might not include the highest characters in the font or the longest descenders in the font. And the lawyers only care about the actual letters in the line of type on the label in front of them--not what other characters the font might contain.

The reason all of this is really peculiar is that it is based on a cockamamie hypothesis that if you specify the minimum height of the type, you have ensured a level of readability. What label designers have done for many decades, however, is to use highly condensed fonts with extremely thin strokes, in all caps, to obscure the readability of any information they were less than proud of, completely defeating the intent of the regulations. But, as we all know, lawyers are not typographers ;-)

Dick


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses at mail.fiam.net]


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Order RoboHelp Office X3 by March 14 and receive a $100 mail-in rebate,
plus FREE WebHelp Merge Module and FREE iMarkup Software, for a
total giveaway value of $439! Order today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Help celebrate TECHWR-L's 10th Anniversary starting this month!
Check out the contests at http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/special/contests/
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you, happy birthday TECHWR-L....

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
Need a smarter person than me: From: Sharon Burton-Hardin
Re: Need a smarter person than me: From: dmbrown

Previous by Author: Re: How the documentation process is supposed to work in IT
Next by Author: Re: Need a smarter person than me
Previous by Thread: RE: Need a smarter person than me
Next by Thread: RE: Need a smarter person than me


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads