RE: Why JPGs for screen captures? test results

Subject: RE: Why JPGs for screen captures? test results
From: "Sean Brierley" <sbri -at- haestad -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:23:29 -0500


There is no reason why TIF would give you the "best print quality."
Aside from CMYK support (and LZW compression if you use it), it has no
inherent advantage other raster formats.

Cheers,

Sean

-----------------------------------------
Sean Brierley
Software Documentation Specialist
Haestad Methods
http://www.haestad.com
203-805-0572 (voice)
203-597-1488 (fax)



-----Original Message-----
From: Anameier, Christine A - Eagan, MN [mailto:CANAMEIE -at- email -dot- usps -dot- gov]


> Clarity of resulting image (original ommitted for obvious resons)
> Photoshop reduced images
> PNG illegible
> GIF illegible
> JPG illegible
> TIF illegible*Best print quality
> BMP illegible


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


LAST CHANCE for this steal of a deal! Purchase RoboHelp X3 by February 28
and receive $100 mail-in rebate and FREE WebHelp Merge Module ($339 value)!
RoboHelp, the Industry Standard in Help Authoring, has won over 55 industry
awards. For more information please visit: http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l2.


"RoboHelp X3 is simply remarkable." - George Bell, Techno-Vision Systems


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Why JPGs for screen captures?
Next by Author: RE: Why JPGs for screen captures? test results
Previous by Thread: RE: Why JPGs for screen captures? test results
Next by Thread: RE: Why JPGs for screen captures? test results


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads