Re: Writing for the Open Source Community

Subject: Re: Writing for the Open Source Community
From: jenny_berger -at- fairfieldresidential -dot- com
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:39:15 -0600


I wouldn't say that there's a living in it, per se, unless you write for a
company that's trying to sell their distibution of Open Source software
(Red Hat for example). But as far as establishing ability, expertise
(i.e., street cred), it's a great vehicle. It's even better if you
subscribe to the spirit of Open Source and just want to make a meaningful
contribution -- a donation is a donation, whether in time or money, right?

Perhaps tech writers who've been around awhile (maybe for much longer than
the 6 years I've been in it) wouldn't feel the "need" to do the Open
Source thing, but to say that only writers who love writing procedures in
their free time is giving short shrift to the opportunity that Open Source
provides. It may not pay in money, but it often pays in solidifying one's
*conceptual* knowledge of an application, or the field the application is
trying to serve. It can also be a nice change of pace for a tech writer
who has produced docs for beginning or intermediate users.

Finally, I'd add this: I hear tech writers on this list and in my
immediate vicinity whine about how manuals suck, how no one will read them
at gunpoint, and how tech writers get no respect, etc. Why not use the
Open Source movement to actually do something about it? Pick a project and
write a good manual for it. Who knows -- if you mention it on your resume,
you might get some good conversation out of it and maybe some leads.

FWIW,

Jenny Berger
Technical Writer
Information Systems
Fairfield Residential





eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com
Sent by: bounce-techwr-l-115343 -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
02/19/2003 01:02 PM
Please respond to eric.dunn


To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
cc:
Subject: Writing for the Open Source Community





Call me thick, but besides creating portfolio pieces, why bother looking
into
open source as a writer? Sure there are hundreds of poorly documented
open-source projects out there, but I for one would like to get paid for
my time
and energy. Good Karma is NOT going to pay the mortgage.

Is there a market of people willing to pay for good documentation for open
source software? Or, is it much like the open source movement as a whole?
It's
great to have 'free' and 'open' software, but there has to be a pocket
book
paying for it somewhere. Is there a living to be made at it or is it a
domain
for those that love writing procedures so much that they'll do it after
hours on
their own time (or heaven forbid steal the time from their real employer).

Eric L. Dunn







^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Buy or upgrade to RoboHelp X3 today and receive the WebHelp
Merge Module for FREE ($299 value). RoboHelp X3's all-new
features include conditional text, completely re-engineered
printed documentation output, Context-sensitive Help Toolkit,
single-source layouts, and more!
Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: Why they don't ask for candidates by technology skills.
Next by Author: Re: Writing for the Open Source Community
Previous by Thread: Re: Writing for the Open Source Community
Next by Thread: Re: Writing for the Open Source Community


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads