Re: Open doc format

Subject: Re: Open doc format
From: "Bill Hall" <bill -dot- hall -at- hotkey -dot- net -dot- au>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 08:45:08 +1100


Bruce Byfield, Eric Dunn and John Posada have been discussing pressures from
governments to forbid the use of "proprietary" software applications in
order to move away from M$ "standards".

I have been too busy to track back to the beginning of this thread, but
these contributions seem to miss the main point. The major problems with
proprietary formats is not the applications themselves - which can be very
useful, easy to use, etc, but with the difficulties of sharing and
exchanging content between different applications.

What is needed are non-proprietary, STANDARDISED, content formats able to
facilitate electronic sharing and exchange of knowledge across all
applications.

Thanks to W3C, we are actually already well down that path with XML
standards, and hopefully within 2-3 years that will be the defacto standard
everyone is using. Those who love Billy Gates can continue to use M$
products, but there will no longer be a major barrier preventing competitors
from offering other more specialised or simpler applications also able to
share information via the standardised formats.

There are also several standards groups within OASIS working towards this.
Personally, I am a member of the eContracts group
(http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/legalxml-econtracts/).

XML offers many advantages beyond non-proprietary standardisation, e.g.,
annotation and the encoding of semantics (http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/,
http://annotation.semanticweb.org/,
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-8
4A9809EC588EF21&catID=2.

It also meets one of Andrew Plato's ideals - separating the authoring of
content from fondling fonts and styles. In an XML world the establishment
and maintenance of styles can (and should) be a task that is completely
separated from the writing task, and is one that is best left to genuine
graphics and design experts, such that writers can concentrate on distilling
knowledge and creating content.


Bill Hall
--------------------------------------------------
O world of spring and autumn, birth and dying!
The endless cycle of idea and action,
Endless invention, endless experiment,
Brings knowledge of motion, but not of stillness;
Knowledge of speech, but not of silence;
Knowledge of words, and ignorance of the Word.
All our knowledge brings us nearer to death,
But nearness to death no nearer to God.
Where is the Life we have lost in living?
Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?
---------------------------------------------------
TS Eliot - The Rock




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Order RoboHelp X3 in November and receive $100 mail in rebate, FREE WebHelp
Merge Module and the new RoboPDF - add powerful PDF output functionality
to RoboHelp X3. Order online today at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Check out SnagIt - The Screen Capture Standard!
Download a free 30-day trial from http://www.techsmith.com/rdr/txt/twr
Find out what all the other tech writers, including Dan, already know!

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Proof that content is more important than style
Next by Author: MS Word field codes search & replace
Previous by Thread: RE: Open doc format
Next by Thread: Re: Open doc format


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads