TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Sean Hower illustrated how one can misparse the sentence "The horse raced
past the barn fell":
<snip> The idea in a sentence like "The horse raced past the barn fell" is
that while you're listening to/reading the sentence, your brain parces it
like this:
>
> ((The horse) + ((raced) + (past the barn))).
>
<snip> It should really be parsed something like this:
>
> (((The horse) + (raced past the barn)) + (fell)).
>
Nice, Sean, but you haven't explained _why_ it can be misparsed (and why
changing "raced" to "run" destroys the "garden path" nature of the
sentence): In this sentence, "raced" can be read as either an _intransitive_
or a _transitive_ verb.
Upon first reading the sentence, you assume "raced" is intransitive: the
horse acted in a way best described as racing. But, when you get to "fell,"
you realize that the horse acted in a way best described as falling, and
that "raced" is a transitive verb of which "the horse" is the object. The
horse didn't race past the barn by itself, someone unspecified raced it past
the barn.
Changing the modifying phrase to "that was raced" (or, better, "that she
raced" -- avoid passive voice) removes the ambiguity. It's immediately clear
that, with regard to racing, the horse wasn't the actor, but the acted-upon.
And, unless there are horse runs (noun), "The horse run past the barn fell"
isn't ambiguous at all because "run" can't be an intransitive verb in this
sentence; it doesn't agree in number with "horse." You could restore the
ambiguity by making the subject plural: "The horses run past the barn fell."
> Drat, I wish I could draw the tree diagram to show how "The horse raced
past the barn" "The horse raced past the barn fell" and "The horse that was
raced past the barn fell" are parced.
>
Well, here's a crude stab at the first 2, omitting articles:
1) horse | raced
---------------------------
\ p
\ a
\ s
\ t
\ barn
-------------
2) horse | fell
---------------------------
\
\ raced
------------
\ p
\ a
\ s
\ t
\ barn
-------------
This is long enough already, so I'll leave (3) as an exercise for the
reader. ;-)
Richard
------
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Voyant Technologies, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT voyanttechDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT freeDASHmarketDOTnet
303-777-0436
------
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All-new RoboHelp X3 is now shipping! Get single sourcing, print-quality
documentation, conditional text and much more, in the most monumental
release ever. Save $100! Order online at http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l
Buy ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 6.0, the most powerful SINGLE SOURCE HELP
AUTHORING TOOL for MS Word. SAVE $100 on the full version and $50 on the
upgrade. Offer ends 10/31/2002 (code: DTH102250). http://www.componentone.com/d2hlist1002
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.