RE: Copyright question

Subject: RE: Copyright question
From: Mark Overton <Mark -dot- Overton -at- Sedgemoor -dot- gov -dot- uk>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 16:06:02 +0100


My understanding is that it depends on how much of the work (original
content) was done in a particular year, and the nature of the resource
you're producing. The dates serve to indicate the effort you put into your
work over a period of time. Following your examples...

A - a product that was first produced in 1998 and re-produced every year
since. For each re-production, the majority of the content was different
each year, i.e., 1999's edition contained only a small amount of 1998's
content but they were sufficiently similar to remain part of a sequence. You
want to establish copyright for the development work done each year. An
example would be a series of books called "The Year's Events" - different
content each time, and physically different books, but you're copyrighting
the overall sequence.

B - a product first produced in 1998, then again in 2002, with ongoing
development throughout the subsequent years. You may or may not have issued
'interim editions' (as in A), but what you need to establish is that the
four-year period is part of a single development cycle. An example would be
Word, which has gone through interim versions and is under constant
development but is always just the one product (Word 95, Word 97, Word 98,
Word 2000, Word 2001, Word 2002, Word X - but we think of it as "Word").

C - a product first produced in 2002. No work was done before this year. If
we were in 2003, the implication would also be that no work after that year.

If in doubt, use the format of (B), with the start date the year you began
and the end date the current year. This establishes that you currently hold
the copyright, and that you have copyright on the intellectual work over the
previous years leading up to the publication.

Outlook 2000, for example, is copyrighted 1995-1999 (the year O2K was
released). If someone claims they have copyright in Outlook 2000 dating from
after this date, the onus is on them to prove Microsoft gifted them with the
IP rights - Mr Gates & co. have laid their claim to all the work leading up
to O2K's release.

-mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Anita Lewis [mailto:anital -at- threerivers-cams -dot- com]
Sent: 17 May 2002 15:53
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Copyright question



When displaying a copyright on a web site, which is correct?
A. 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002
B. 1998 - 2002
C. 2002
Are there circumstances in which one might be used over the other?


Mark Overton
IT Projects Officer
Sedgemoor District Council
Bridgwater House, King Square
Bridgwater
Somerset TA6 3AR

Direct line (01278) 436409.

Disclaimer

Views: The views expressed in this electronic communication are those of the
writer and not, unless otherwise stated, the views of Sedgemoor District
Council.

Confidentiality: The addressee(s) of this electronic communication shall
treat its contents in confidence and take all reasonable steps to ensure it
is not accessed or made available to any third party. Sedgemoor District
Council will not be liable for any unauthorised access to the contents
during transit or whilst stored on electronic media outside of its direct
control.

Viruses: Sedgemoor District Council take all reasonable steps to ensure that
this communication and any attachments are virus-free; however, the Council
cannot accept liability in respect of any complaint arising as a result of
this message or its attachments.



________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by May 15. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: FW: Billion and other internationalization items (was Appendixes vs. Annexes)
Next by Author: RE: Problems with fonts in Acrobat
Previous by Thread: Re: Copyright question
Next by Thread: Number vs figure


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads