RE: Appendixes vs. Annexes

Subject: RE: Appendixes vs. Annexes
From: Mark Overton <Mark -dot- Overton -at- Sedgemoor -dot- gov -dot- uk>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:56:57 +0100


I always thought it was more an amalgamation of the most common spellings
and grammatical practices, to reach as wide an audience as possible. For
example, talking about borders of screenshots, you would write "you can
apply different types of borders", but in strict Queen's English this should
be "you can apply different types of border" (singular). Most of the world,
however, would use the plural form, so in this instance British English
differs from the international. Another example - International English
generally uses the American billion (1,000,000,000) as opposed to the
British (1,000,000,000,000), which is becoming less and less common.

On the other hand, most of the world, including Britain, travels on
railways, but Americans use railroads. International English probably bears
a slightly closer resemblance to British English, on the whole.

-mark

-----Original Message-----
From: tom -dot- green -at- iwon -dot- com [mailto:tom -dot- green -at- iwon -dot- com]
Sent: 14 May 2002 19:37
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: Appendixes vs. Annexes

> What constitutes "International English"?
>
I interpret "International English" to mean the "Queen's" English that is
taught in schools all over the world except in America.

---
Mark Overton
IT Projects Officer
Sedgemoor District Council
Bridgwater House, King Square
Bridgwater
Somerset TA6 3AR

Direct line (01278) 436409.

Disclaimer

Views: The views expressed in this electronic communication are those of the
writer and not, unless otherwise stated, the views of Sedgemoor District
Council.

Confidentiality: The addressee(s) of this electronic communication shall
treat its contents in confidence and take all reasonable steps to ensure it
is not accessed or made available to any third party. Sedgemoor District
Council will not be liable for any unauthorised access to the contents
during transit or whilst stored on electronic media outside of its direct
control.

Viruses: Sedgemoor District Council take all reasonable steps to ensure that
this communication and any attachments are virus-free; however, the Council
cannot accept liability in respect of any complaint arising as a result of
this message or its attachments.


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Check out RoboDemo for tutorials! It makes creating full-motion software
demonstrations and other onscreen support materials easy and intuitive.
Need RoboHelp? Save $100 on RoboHelp Office in May with our mail-in rebate.
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr-l

Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by May 15. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Appendixes vs. Annexes
Next by Author: FW: Billion and other internationalization items (was Appendixes vs. Annexes)
Previous by Thread: RE: Trees, menu commands, and UI design
Next by Thread: FrameMaker files to UNIX man


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads