TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Programming / scripting languages in tech-writing
Subject:RE: Programming / scripting languages in tech-writing From:Ed Gregory <edgregory -at- comcast -dot- net> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 07 May 2002 22:30:41 -0500
Bruce,
If the goal is to move from tech writing to IT, then by all means dive into
XML. If you plan to remain a writer, then learning XML is likely to be more
of a hobby.
Dice, among the largest online job databases, lists 120 openings nationwide
for technical writers with XML experience and four times that many for
technical writers with experience in the C family.
Of course, YEMV.
-Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Byfield [mailto:bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:56 AM
To: Ed Gregory
Cc: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Programming / scripting languages in tech-writing
Ed Gregory wrote:
>At the STC conference here in Nashville yesterday, during a panel
discussion
>on job market trends and skills, there seemed to be solid agreement that
one
>skill combination that remains in strong demand is the writer/programmer.
>The desired language(s): C, C++, C#.
>
Personally, I'd be a little cautious about learning C# unless it was
used on a job-site. There's a demand now, true enough. But, even with
Microsoft's clout, I wonder whether the demand will last.
>As for other "languages" that tech writers need: HTML and Javascript,
unless
>everything you plan to do is for hardcopy output. Beyond that, Visual Basic
>for the previously mentioned Word (and other MS Office) automation. If you
>want to get heavily into Web delivery systems, PHP, SQL, MySQL, ASP, and
>*shudder* XML. The panel generally agreed that learning XML, other than a
>basic overview, is wasted unless you are in an organization that is
>currently moving to XML.
>
If you don't mind me asking, why (joking aside) the shudder over XML? Also,
what's the reason for thinking that learning XML is wasted? I'm curious.
--
Bruce Byfield 604.421.7177 bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com
"'We do right when the cost is bearable but morality flourishes among those
who won't suffer by it."
- George Turner, "The Sea and Summer"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Buy RoboHelp Office in May and you'll save $100 with our mail-in rebate.
Or switch from Doc-to-Help or ForeHelp to RoboHelp Office for only $499.
Get the help authoring tool PC magazine recently awarded a perfect score!
Go to http://www.ehelp.com/techwr
Free copy of ARTS PDF Tools when you register for the PDF
Conference by April 30. Leading-Edge Practices for Enterprise
& Government, June 3-5, Bethesda,MD. www.PDFConference.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.