TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Okay you people who think Word walks on water, I have a problem for you to
solve for me if you would.
I'm building a procedural template for the client. Micro$oft's definition of
numbering:
1.
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1.1.
1.1.1.1.1.
...
IS NOT usable numbering. Based on research done by a co-worker's consulting
firm, we've had great success using the following five level number
structure:
1.
1.1.
1.1.1.
A.
1.
This is the structure we want to incorporate into our templates in Word.
FrameMaker works fine, but I don't have that luxury here (yet).
Presently, I can do this manually as most of the procedures will not be that
long. However, I have had other clients whose have needed to be able to do
this with more detailed procedural content.
TIA
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you know you can get RoboHelp certified?
To learn how, visit http://www.ehelp.com/techwr. Be sure to also check out
our special pricing offers and promotions for RoboHelp 2002.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
