TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: What is our art? From:"Andrew Dugas" <dugas -at- intalio -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:59:31 -0800
In support of "Tools" in recruiting, etc.
Employers and recruiters need something quantifiable when screening
candidates, especially now that layoffs have blown the resume floodgates
wide open.
Expertise in tools may say little about the writer's writing skills, but
they can speak volumes about their experience, type and depth of experience,
versatility (as evidence by number and diversity of tools), and professional
drive.
Consider the two listings and what you presume about the writer:
* 6 yrs experience, Frame, Word, MSProject, some RoboHelp.
If you were hiring, which listing is more attractive? Why?
Assuming they are being truthful, what might you conclude about the two
writers?
One has more experience, but the other has a wider skill set. Why hasn't the
more experienced writer picked up more than a handful of tools in six years?
The one with less experience seems to learn faster and have no problem
learning new tools, a trait that might extend to learning the
products/technologies to be documented.
Of course, work history may add a twist. We might see that the less
experienced writer picked all those skills by jobhopping. We might see that
the more experienced has had only one employer but played a more managerial
role (as suggested by MSProject), and thus suffered in the actual
skills-acquisition area.
The better fit depends on the position available.
Andy
PS: Questions like what you do or have done on a daily basis are important
but resist being boiled down into a list that's easy to evaluate. They are
better left for the next level of screening.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you know you can get RoboHelp certified?
To learn how, visit http://www.ehelp.com/techwr. Be sure to also check out
our special pricing offers and promotions for RoboHelp 2002.
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.