Re: Quality of source material from Development

Subject: Re: Quality of source material from Development
From: "Dana Worley" <dana -at- campbellsci -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:31:27 -0700

> 2. Product availability The product is not functional so testing
> and working with it is impossible.

I won't even begin to document a product if I don't have it in my
hands. How in the world can you write about something if you don't
USE it??

(yes, yes, I know, give me the jet fighter argument, will you....)

Dana W.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Collect Royalties, Not Rejection Letters! Tell us your rejection story when you
submit your manuscript to iUniverse Nov. 6 -Dec. 15 and get five free copies of
your book. What are you waiting for? http://www.iuniverse.com/media/techwr

Have you looked at the new content on TECHWR-L lately?
See http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ and check it out.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: ADMIN: RE: Network Security Article Clarification
Next by Author: RE: documenting GUI components that are not labelled
Previous by Thread: Re: Quality of source material from Development
Next by Thread: RE: Quality of source material from Development


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads