RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."

Subject: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
From: Jim Shaeffer <jims -at- spsi -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 08:31:06 -0500

> The part that truly matters is the information. Everything
> else is dressing. It might be important dressing - but it can never
> overtake the value of the information.
>
> Andrew Plato

But, there are fascinating reports of users who discarded solid
technical documentation because it looked too good. They dismissed
it as 'marketing fluff' without bothering to read it.

Jim Shaeffer (jims -at- spsi -dot- com)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Jargon Lovin' Fool
Next by Author: RE: TECHWR-L: XML & the future of tech writing (topic from last week) LONG
Previous by Thread: Re: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."
Next by Thread: RE: "They don't need no stinkin' documentation..."


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads