RE: Documentalist?

Subject: RE: Documentalist?
From: Kim Roper <kim -dot- roper -at- vitana -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:50:20 -0400

Leslie Johnson said:
>
> Darn...I thought I was a documentator. Maybe that'd explain
> why no one's
> doing what I tell them to...
>
> Leslie
>
Perhaps you're too informal for them and they don't appreciate your
docusational style. I suggest establishing and enforcing a few rules.
Every technical writer needs to be a doctator every once in a while.

Cheers ... Kim
Catering to the documentally challenged.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Announcing new options for IPCC 01, October 24-27 in Santa Fe,
New Mexico: attend the entire event or select a single day.
For details and online registration, visit http://ieeepcs.org/2001

Your monthly sponsorship message here reaches more than
5000 technical writers, providing 2,500,000+ monthly impressions.
Contact Eric (ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com) for details and availability.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: RE: Rhetorical question about formatting devices :-)
Next by Author: RE: Jargon Use
Previous by Thread: RE: Documentalist?
Next by Thread: Re: Documentalist?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads