Re: Opinion of a site.

Subject: Re: Opinion of a site.
From: Jeff Hanvey <techwriter -at- jewahe -dot- net>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:16:52 -0700 (PDT)

--- John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>

> wrote:

I don't want to go back to the person and say "This site sucks" with

>no foundation. (BTW..."it is ugly" doesn't count) Therefore, if I can

>get one or two responses as to whether it is or isn't a properly

>created site (such as why it isn't accessible to a certain portion of

>those with disabilities), I'd appreciate it. Please feel free to

>submit your commnts off-list. Also, if you hve any favorite links of

>warm-all-over-touchy-feely web sites that ARE directed to those with

>disabilities, I'd consider seeing what ya got.



All the links on the main page are images or image-maps, which defeats the purpose of style sheets. The disabled may have difficulty accessing the information because they simply cannot see it. To make matters worse, the designer did not include the "alt" tag so that people know what's there when images are turned off.



The "alt" tag is also used by many accessibility programs, so not including it is a major oversite.



>From a pure design standpoint, the blinking text is *horrible* because it emphasizes the wrong thing - the welcome text instead of the site's name or the links.



The effect of the site itself make me think of a game - my mother walked by as soon as it was displayed and asked me if I was playing another computer game (she's completely computer illiterate). That may not be a negative, since this is a "Young people's press" site.



On the other pages, the purple background is a bit overwhelming, and destracts from the text of the articles. What's worse is that it's a javascript that makes that background 'static," so you can't escape the background.



Also, I notice that there is no text links anywhere in the site - they are all images. For accessibility purposes, the designer should have included at least a bar across the bottom that is pure text.b Those links are also not very consistent, so the site is hard to navigate without returning constantly to the main page.



The only concession that is made to the disabled is the "text-only" version. Unfortunately, the link is hidden at the bottom of the navigation bar, and the textpage itself jumbles the entire site into one long page.



Overall, if I were disabled, I'd probably not return to this site.

_____________________________________________________________
Jeff Hanvey: http://www.jewahe.net

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

TECH*COMM 2001 Conference, July 15-18 in Washington, DC
The Help Technology Conference, August 21-24 in Boston, MA
Details and online registration at http://www.SolutionsEvents.com


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: Gotta Spend Some Money
Next by Author: Medical Writing
Previous by Thread: RE: Opinion of a site.
Next by Thread: RE: Opinion of a site.


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads