TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Individual vs. Departmental Writer's Voice From:Janice Gelb <janiceg -at- marvin -dot- eng -dot- sun -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
In article 1631B1EA5E24D41181590008C72B5C8A0EB48C -at- EXCHANGE, EEstep -at- mrisystem -dot- com (Elizabeth Estep) writes:
>
>The question:
>
>Assuming that two modules are writing to the same general audience
>(accounting clerks and accountants), is it appropriate for a departmental
>editor to make edits to keep two separate manuals (say one for an Accounts
>Receivable module and one for an Accounts Payable module) consistent in tone
>and type of language?
>
>We've two writers making the following arguments:
>
>1 - Only the types of style as defined in the departmental style guide (i.e.
>punctuation, limited passive voice, bulleted lists formats) should be
>enforced. Anything else is "individual writing style" and should be allowed
>because otherwise a) the writer is stripped of creativity, and b) there's a
>negative impact on the writer-editor relationship.
>
>2 - Manuals should be consistent in terminology, phrasing, and organization,
>except where differences are required based on the audience. The editor
>should edit manuals aimed at the same audience to sound as much as possible
>as if they were written by the same person.
>
This is a difficult question to answer without knowing the
types of edits to which writer #1 is objecting. Generally,
manuals from the same company should sound as if they come
from the same source, so they should reflect a consistent
style. OTOH, too strict a style (e.g., making an editorial
distinction between using "refer to" for cross-references
to external sources and "see" for internal ones) probably
won't be noticed by the reading audience.
Past a certain point, individuality is fine, but if writers
really value creative writing above all else, they should be
writing fiction under their own names. Once they write manuals
coming from a company, they have to submerge their creativity
to a certain extent for the greater good of a common voice
from the company.
*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com
Sponsored by Cub Lea, specialist in low-cost outsourced development
and documentation. Overload and time-sensitive jobs at exceptional
rates. Unique free gifts for all visitors to http://www.cublea.com
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.