Re: Individual vs. Departmental Writer's Voice

Subject: Re: Individual vs. Departmental Writer's Voice
From: Janice Gelb <janiceg -at- marvin -dot- eng -dot- sun -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:36:35 -0700 (PDT)

In article 1631B1EA5E24D41181590008C72B5C8A0EB48C -at- EXCHANGE, EEstep -at- mrisystem -dot- com (Elizabeth Estep) writes:
>
>The question:
>
>Assuming that two modules are writing to the same general audience
>(accounting clerks and accountants), is it appropriate for a departmental
>editor to make edits to keep two separate manuals (say one for an Accounts
>Receivable module and one for an Accounts Payable module) consistent in tone
>and type of language?
>
>We've two writers making the following arguments:
>
>1 - Only the types of style as defined in the departmental style guide (i.e.
>punctuation, limited passive voice, bulleted lists formats) should be
>enforced. Anything else is "individual writing style" and should be allowed
>because otherwise a) the writer is stripped of creativity, and b) there's a
>negative impact on the writer-editor relationship.
>
>2 - Manuals should be consistent in terminology, phrasing, and organization,
>except where differences are required based on the audience. The editor
>should edit manuals aimed at the same audience to sound as much as possible
>as if they were written by the same person.
>

This is a difficult question to answer without knowing the
types of edits to which writer #1 is objecting. Generally,
manuals from the same company should sound as if they come
from the same source, so they should reflect a consistent
style. OTOH, too strict a style (e.g., making an editorial
distinction between using "refer to" for cross-references
to external sources and "see" for internal ones) probably
won't be noticed by the reading audience.

Past a certain point, individuality is fine, but if writers
really value creative writing above all else, they should be
writing fiction under their own names. Once they write manuals
coming from a company, they have to submerge their creativity
to a certain extent for the greater good of a common voice
from the company.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by Cub Lea, specialist in low-cost outsourced development
and documentation. Overload and time-sensitive jobs at exceptional
rates. Unique free gifts for all visitors to http://www.cublea.com

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: XML book
Next by Author: Re: Handling the anti-team situation
Previous by Thread: Re: Duplex problem
Next by Thread: Re: Individual vs. Departmental Writer's Voice


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads