Re: XML & XHTML

Subject: Re: XML & XHTML
From: Bruce Byfield <bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:31:08 -0700

Michael Collier wrote:
>
> Pursuant to the "XML as a document language" thread, I suggest that one way
> of working with the XML model is to use the XHTML doctype in web pages that
> you own.

Call me lazy, but unless a client insists otherwise, I'd rather skip
XHTML and go directly to XML. XHTML is an interim solution, and I'd
rather not confuse my already over-worked brain with two markup
languages that are just similar enough to be confusing when I can get
away with learning one.

--
Bruce Byfield 604.421.7177 bbyfield -at- axionet -dot- com

"You can bring your JCBs,
You can bring your drills and your drivers,
Your pocket piece and your private police,
We'll be there, we'll be there, we'll be there."
-OysterBand

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

*** Deva(tm) Tools for Dreamweaver and Deva(tm) Search ***
Build Contents, Indexes, and Search for Web Sites and Help Systems
Available now at http://www.devahelp.com or info -at- devahelp -dot- com

Sponsored by Information Mapping, Inc., a professional services firm
specializing in Knowledge Management and e-content solutions. See
http://www.infomap.com or 800-463-6627 for more about our solutions.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: Re: OT: Go (Was Respect)
Next by Author: Re: Is a bad index better than no index?
Previous by Thread: XML & XHTML
Next by Thread: Re: XML & XHTML


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads