RE: Word templates vs. layout/design?

Subject: RE: Word templates vs. layout/design?
From: "David Berg" <dberg -at- dmpnet -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:07:30 -0600

> from Steve Hudson...
> Totally, completely, 100% disagree. Check your "Smooth screen fonts" box.
> from Geoff Hart...
> Word doesn't set type very elegantly (to put it kindly),

Steve, font smoothing and setting type are not the same thing. And even
though I use Word regularly and prefer it for many purposes over some other
tools, most notably PageMaker (yes, I know one's a word processor and one's
a DTP program! <g>), I really have to agree with Geoff that Word isn't great
at setting type (kerning, tracking, etc.).

David Berg

Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17) or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by ForeFront, Inc., maker of ForeHelp Help authoring tools
for print, WinHelp, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and cross-platform InterHelp
See for more information and free evaluation downloads

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Word and PageMaker questions
Next by Author: RE: Advice wanted...
Previous by Thread: RE: Word templates vs. layout/design?
Next by Thread: Word templates vs. layout/design?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads