RE: reviewing: the saga concluded

Subject: RE: reviewing: the saga concluded
From: "Carnall, Jane" <Jane -dot- Carnall -at- compaq -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:35:01 -0000

>The problem is that the document is very technical. If I could get the
>developer's time for an hour to go through it and check exactly what he
>meant to write, then revise it, then have him review the changed sections,
>it would be greatly improved.

We compromised, but I did it... and it didn't eat up nearly as much time as
I'd feared. Errors cleared up and the three paras that were really making my
teeth itch are clarified. Thanks to this list, (especially Sanjay Srikonda,
Tommy Green, Tom Murrell, Darriel Dawne, and Kevin McLauchlan) for your
support. (The developer, incidentally, is leaving in two months... <g>)

Jane Carnall
Technical Writer, Compaq, UK
Unless stated otherwise, these opinions are mine, and mine alone.

Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17) or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by ForeFront, Inc., maker of ForeHelp Help authoring tools
for print, WinHelp, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and cross-platform InterHelp
See for more information and free evaluation downloads

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: reviewing: the saga continues
Next by Author: RE: HUMOR: I Need Help
Previous by Thread: API Documentation?
Next by Thread: Link One

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads