RE: Frames and Compatibility (was: web admin duties)

[bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com]

What I should have said was "reading by column instead of reading by row".

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Murrell [mailto:trmurrell -at- yahoo -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 12:30 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: RE: Frames and Compatibility (was: web admin duties)


--- bryan -dot- westbrook -at- amd -dot- com wrote:
> For example, readers for the blind usually go strictly from left to
> right so any table that is oriented for vertical reading will not be
> correctly interpreted.

provides, and that works for me as what is in each cell/column is
independent of what is in the next, or previous, one. Within the
cell/column, however, you do read top down, which I would describe as
reading vertically. But that can't be what you mean, can it?


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Develop HTML-Based Help with Macromedia Dreamweaver 4 ($100 STC Discount)
**WEST COAST LOCATIONS** San Jose (Mar 1-2), San Francisco (Apr 16-17)
http://www.weisner.com/training/dreamweaver_help.htm or 800-646-9989.

Sponsored by DigiPub Solutions Corp, producers of PDF 2001 
Conference East, June 4-5, Baltimore/Washington D.C. area.
http://www.pdfconference.com or toll-free 877/278-2131. 

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as: archive -at- raycomm -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Send administrative questions to ejray -at- raycomm -dot- com -dot-  Visit 
http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.