Re: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)

Subject: Re: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)
From: Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 08:11:54 -0500

Stephen Martin wrote:

> Tracy Boyington (and others) have expressed the following thought:
>
> > If the industry stops using a term because enough users find it
> > confusing or offensive, it would be ridiculous for us to refuse to
> > follow along simply because someone on techwr-l accused us of being
> > "PC."
>
> 1. The industry hasn't stopped using the term Master and Slave.

True. But master/slave was just one example of terminology that is being
questioned or reconsidered.

> 2. It shouldn't matter why the industry stops using a term.

No, it shouldn't. But apparently, to some people, it does (based on what I've
read here).

> 3. We're all adults here (unless we've got any Doogie Howser TWs),

Welcome to the list; you must be a newbie. ;->

Tracy
--
=======================================================
Tracy Boyington mailto:tracy_boyington -at- okvotech -dot- org
Oklahoma Department of Vocational & Technical Education
Stillwater, Oklahoma http://www.okvotech.org/cimc
I want to be a millionaire
=======================================================






Previous by Author: Re: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)
Next by Author: Re: career in TW for MFA?
Previous by Thread: Re: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)
Next by Thread: RE: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads