Re: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)
----------------------------------SNIP-----------------------------------
As writers, I think it is our job to address the audience in a way that engages
them rather than in a way that causes them to disengage from the document. We
no longer blindly hold to the notion that only males are reading our documents.
So we adjust to make the female reader feel a part of the audience, too.
When someone asks, "Should I continue to use such-and-such a term," as the
writer who initiated the "Master/Slave" thread did, they are performing an
essential writing task. How will my audience react to the language I am using
(have used or intend to use)? This questioning is less a matter of being held
hostage to some nebulous conspiracy enforcing Political Correctness and more a
matter of writers maintaining an awareness of who their audience is and how
that audience will react to the language choices the writer makes.
Advocating for the audience, I remain sincerely yours,
====================
| Nullius in Verba |
====================
Dan Emory, Dan Emory & Associates
FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing
Voice/Fax: 949-722-8971 E-Mail: danemory -at- primenet -dot- com
10044 Adams Ave. #208, Huntington Beach, CA 92646
---Subscribe to the "Free Framers" list by sending a message to
majordomo -at- omsys -dot- com with "subscribe framers" (no quotes) in the body.
Previous by Author:
Re: Constructing site maps
Next by Author:
Re: consistency in terminology
Previous by Thread:
Re: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)
Next by Thread:
Re: Political Correctness (Was Re: Master/Slave)
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads