Re: Bullets, numbers, ego conflicts

Subject: Re: Bullets, numbers, ego conflicts
From: "Teri A. Ward" <taw0200 -at- eeidf002 -dot- ca -dot- boeing -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:33:03 -0700 (PDT)

A possible compromise is:

a. One thing
b. Another thing
c. Something else

Although the letters may *suggest* a sequence, I
don't come across "step a" too often. Letters
also make it easier to refer to individual
items when there is a fairly long list.

My two pesos worth.

Tammie Ward
Technical Writer/Web Designer
Seattle

______________snip_________________________
> I had a job in a strife-filled office a few years ago, and this question of
> bullets vs. numbers came up there. We had documents with as many as 20 or
> more bullet items on a page in some cases. These were not sequential like a
> series of steps; they were suggested features or potential risks.
>
> In review meetings, I would have a question on, say, bullet 17, and everyone
> around the table would count down the list with their pen tips (the smart
> ones didn't move their lips *G*)
>
> I suggested that we number the line items, and the idea was shot down
> because assigning numbers suggested ranking and setting priorities. Sigh.
> That was when I realized that every line item in the document was the result
> of clashing personalities and differing approaches to the problem. The
> documentation suffered because it accurately reflected the divisiveness and
> conflicts festering among the writers and editors.
>
> I left that job, and as far as I know, that company never did succeed with
> the project the documentation covered.
>





Previous by Author: Re: PowerPoint Conversion to PDF
Next by Author: Re: Screen Captures in UNIX
Previous by Thread: Bullets, numbers, ego conflicts
Next by Thread: RE: Strategy when dealing with HR depts


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads