TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Since Chris K. DID receive proper accented characters,
is there anybody on the list who DID NOT? That would
be significant, and apropos.
I was nudged into making my query when my wife sent
the same characters to me from her office, where
they use Lotus Notes for e-mail. In my Outlook,
with exactly the same settings that I used to send
to you folks, I received HER text with question marks
in place of all the accented characters (e-accent-aigu,
e-accent-grave, e-circumflex, plus c-cedille and
a's with accents).
It happens that she uses French-Canadian keyboard.
I use US-English, if that matters. She types her
accented characters directly. I use [Alt]-130, etc.
She corresponds frequently with her mother, and
reports accented-character problems. Her Mom is
a translator, and may soon be doing some work for
my company. While I'm not fluent, I can certainly
read her French and recognize where accents are
supposed to be, but if Mom-in-Law does a bunch of
pages, I really don't want to spend a lot of time
re-inserting accented characters when I pull her
Word text into Frame. Similarly, if we pass small
chunks back and forth during e-mail discussions,
I'd rather avoid problems where I can, and similarly
again, when we start dealing with Spanish and
German translation, I'd like to know what to
anticipate and how best to get along with those folk.
So again, I certainly know how to put my lips
together and blow accents (western, anyway), but
I'm rarely confident that the recipient gets 'em
as I thought I sent 'em, or that I'll get 'em
back the way the other party intends to send...
if you see what I mean.
Thanks for your interest. It all helps to flesh
out the picture.
I'll look into that document that Sandy mentioned,
but I'm looking to be a follower, not a leader in
this context (i.e., not much chance of me evangelizing
for some standard or other).