TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: The Old Argument: Framemaker vs. MS Word From:"David Knopf" <david -at- knopf -dot- com> To:"Darren Barefoot" <dbarefoot -at- mpsbc -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:28:09 -0800
Darren Barefoot wrote:
| The reality is, if you want to generate a number of digital output formats
| (HTML, HTMLHelp, WinHelp, PDF, etc.), FrameMaker is not a viable
| alternative. DB.
Sorry, but this is nonsense. We create WinHelp, HTML Help, JavaHelp, and
standard HTML direct from FrameMaker on a regular basis. We do it with
WebWorks Publisher from Quadralay, and with very good results, I might add.
