TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Are you debating the elimination of printed docs? (An idea.. -- .)
Subject:RE: Are you debating the elimination of printed docs? (An idea.. -- .) From:Emru Townsend <etownsen -at- Softimage -dot- com> To:"'techwrl'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- raycomm -dot- com> Date:Fri, 7 Jan 2000 11:15:10 -0500
I had a Rocket eBook for a few months while I was working on some articles
on e-books (here's one: http://www.janmag.com/features/ebooks.html). I
think that once you get past the "I can't turn pages" prejudice, it's pretty
good. I also wouldn't mind reducing the shelf space I have dedicated to all
my software & hardware docs. With a few tweaks (color screens, for
instance) I don't see any reason why the eBook or its descendant couldn't do
away with paper docs.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Barefoot [mailto:dbarefoot -at- mpsbc -dot- com]
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> As a point of interest in this never-ending debate, Microsoft
> and Barnes and
> Noble just today announced that they're going to join forces on the
> promotion and development of the Rocket eBook--the handheld,
> shaped-like-a-paperback digital book--and associated
> software. In fact,
> within the next 10 years, Barnes and Noble Vice Chairman
> Steve Riggio said,
> "There will be an electronic version of virtually every single book in
> print." See the following URL for more details:
>
>http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2417896,00.html
>
> Might this technology, if it gets wide-spread enough, be the
> nail in the
> coffin of the paper vs. online debate? Can it provide the best of both
> worlds? Some might scoff at the possibility of "an eBook on
> every coffee
> table," but they said the same thing about the television,
> automobile and
> ever needing more than 64K. Just a thought. DB.